What is the Climate Change Performance Index?

The Climate Change Performance Index (CCPI) is an independent monitoring tool designed to enhance transparency in international climate politics. It evaluates and compares the climate mitigation performance of 63 countries plus the European Union (EU), which together account for over 90 % of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. (Climate Change Performance Index)

The CCPI is published annually (typically around COP) by Germanwatch in cooperation with the NewClimate Institute and the Climate Action Network. (germanwatch.org)

Its aim is to provide an independent, comparative assessment of how countries are advancing (or lagging) in climate mitigation, thereby exerting public and political pressure. (Climate Change Performance Index)

---

Methodology and Indicators

To understand what CCPI 2025 tells us, we must look at how it is built: its categories, metrics, weighting, and scoring system.

Categories & Indicators

The overall CCPI score for a country is composed from four main categories:

1. GHG Emissions
   
2. Renewable Energy
   
3. Energy Use
   
4. Climate Policy
   

These four are further subdivided into 14 indicators in total. (Climate Change Performance Index)

• GHG Emissions looks at current emissions levels, recent trends, and compatibility with Paris-aligned pathways.
  
• Renewable Energy evaluates the share and growth of renewables, as well as policy support.
  
• Energy Use examines energy efficiency and per capita energy consumption.
  
• Climate Policy rates the policy framework, target ambition, implementation, and international diplomacy.
  The “Climate Policy” dimension relies in part on expert surveys within each country. (Greenpeace Schweiz)
  

Each indicator has a defined weighting. (For example, “Renewables” is one of the four categories but does not dominate the total metric.) (Reddit)

Scoring & Ranking

• Countries receive numeric scores in each indicator, normalized to a range (often 0-100 or similar), which are then aggregated with weights to produce category scores and then an overall score. (Climate Change Performance Index)
  
• The rankings are then derived from these scores. However, no country in CCPI 2025 receives the top “very high” rating, so the first three positions remain empty. (Climate Change Performance Index)
  
• Thus, countries can be ranked “high,” “medium,” “low,” or “very low” performers depending on where they fall in the distribution. (Climate Change Performance Index)
  

Because of this structure, even the best-performing countries still may not meet what would be considered a “Paris-aligned ideal” in every dimension.

---

Key Findings from CCPI 2025

Let’s look at what CCPI 2025 reveals about countries’ performance, trends, and surprises.

Overall Patterns

• The CCPI 2025 shows a mixed picture: in many countries, renewable energy share has grown over the past five years, but emissions trends and policy implementation often lag. (newclimate.org)
  
• While 61 of the 64 assessed entities have increased renewable share, 29 countries have emission trends rated “low” or “very low”. (newclimate.org)
  
• The top 3 slots remain vacant, since no country yet meets all criteria with excellence. (Climate Change Performance Index)
  

Top Performers

• The highest-ranked countries (though still not “very high”) are:
  
  • Denmark holds 4th place. It is the only country scoring well in the Climate Policy dimension. (newclimate.org)
    
  • Netherlands follows at 5th. (Greenpeace Schweiz)
    
  • Other relatively high performers include the UK and Philippines. (The Indian Express)
    
• Sixteen EU countries rank among high and medium performers. (RTÉ)
  

Low Performers

• The bottom of the ranking includes major oil and gas producers:
  
  • Iran ranks 67th
    
  • Saudi Arabia is 66th
    
  • UAE 65th
    
  • Russia 64th
    These countries receive low scores especially for low renewable shares (often < 3 %) and weak mitigation efforts. (newclimate.org)
    
• Other countries with poor performance include China (55th) and U.S. (57th)—both large emitters with policy and emissions challenges. (PwOnlyIAS)
  

India in CCPI 2025

• India ranks 10th overall in CCPI 2025. (Climate Change Performance Index)
  
• In subcategories:
  
  • GHG Emissions: India scores “high”
    
  • Energy Use: “high”
    
  • Climate Policy: “medium”
    
  • Renewable Energy: “low”
    The report notes India’s strong deployment of renewables but also its continued heavy reliance on coal. (Climate Change Performance Index)
    
• India is one of only two G20 countries classified as “high performers” in this edition (the other being the UK). (PwOnlyIAS)
  

United States

• The U.S. is ranked 57th and classified as a very low performer in several dimensions. (Climate Change Performance Index)
  
• It scores very low in GHG Emissions, Energy Use, and Renewable Energy; its “Climate Policy” is rated somewhat better (medium). (Climate Change Performance Index)
  

---

Interpretation and Implications

What do these results tell us, and how should they be interpreted (carefully)?

What the CCPI is useful for

1. Benchmarking & pressure
   It creates a public, comparable benchmark to pressure governments, civil society, and media to improve climate policy.
   
2. Highlighting gaps
   Even top performers have weak spots—e.g. a country might have strong renewables but weak policy coherence or emissions trends. CCPI exposes these gaps.
   
3. Tracking trends over time
   Annual updates allow seeing progress or regression, which is valuable for accountability.
   
4. Comparative insight
   Allows comparing across countries with differing contexts, though with limitations (see below).
   

Limitations and caveats

• Scope focus
  CCPI focuses on mitigation (reducing emissions), not adaptation, climate impacts, or resilience. Countries may perform poorly in CCPI despite strong adaptation policies not captured in the index.
  
• Indicator selection and weighting
  The choice of 14 indicators and their weightings influence outcomes. Some aspects (e.g. climate justice, equity, historical responsibility) are not fully captured.
  
• Contextual differences
  Countries differ enormously in starting point, resources, vulnerability, development level, and emissions base. CCPI is not a perfect apples-to-apples comparison.
  
• Annual time lag
  The data typically lags by 1–2 years — meaning very recent policy changes or rapid transformations may not be fully reflected.
  
• “No top rank” issue
  The fact that no one gets the top three slots can raise frustration — it means the bar is extremely high. It underscores global shortfall but can also dilute morale or perceived fairness.
  

Despite these limitations, the CCPI remains a leading and influential index for climate policy discourse.

---

Lessons and Insights from CCPI 2025

From the 2025 edition, we can draw several thematic lessons:

1. Renewables are expanding, but not fast enough
   Most countries have increased renewable shares over the past five years, yet many still rely heavily on fossil fuels. (newclimate.org)
   
2. Policy ambition often lags implementation
   Even countries with strong climate goals sometimes struggle with translating them into consistent, enforceable policy. Denmark is a rare example that performs well in this policy dimension. (newclimate.org)
   
3. Large emitters struggle
   Countries like China and the U.S. are especially penalized because of their contributions to global emissions and slower transitions in some sectors. Their rankings reflect systemic inertia. (PwOnlyIAS)
   
4. Coal dependence remains a liability
   Many countries that continue to rely heavily on coal (or fossil gas) score poorly in emissions and renewable categories.
   
5. Policy changes can cause big swings
   As shown by Argentina’s drop, a change in government or policy direction can dramatically affect climate performance. (newclimate.org)
   
6. No country is “perfect yet”
   The fact that no country earns the top rank reveals how far global climate action still has to go.
   

---

What Should Countries Do, Based on CCPI Insights?

If a country wants to improve its CCPI ranking (or better, its real climate performance), here’s a strategic approach:

• Set ambitious, economy-wide emissions reduction targets aligned with 1.5 °C pathways, not just sectoral slices.
  
• Accelerate renewable energy deployment, especially in energy-intensive sectors, and focus on storage, grid flexibility, and integrating variable sources.
  
• Improve energy efficiency across buildings, industry, and transport.
  
• Strengthen climate policy frameworks: clarity, consistency, enforcement, and alignment across ministries.
  
• Phase out coal and fossil fuel subsidies, redirecting investment toward clean alternatives.
  
• Regularly update and raise ambition, ensuring policies adapt to new technologies and data.
  
• Engage stakeholders and ensure fairness so that the transition is socially inclusive.
  
• Monitor and report performance transparently to build accountability.
  

---

Conclusion

The Climate Change Performance Index 2025 is a vital tool in assessing how nations compare in the fight against climate change, especially regarding mitigation. Its combination of emissions, renewable trends, energy use, and policy dimensions offers a multi-angle picture. The results are sobering: many countries still lag, and none meet the ideal standard across all metrics.

But the index also offers pathways: we can see where countries are making progress and where they are faltering. For policymakers, activists, and citizens alike, it is a roadmap of what to emphasize next. As the climate emergency intensifies, tools like CCPI become ever more important in driving transparency, accountability, and ambition.